Analysis Of The Book One Flew Over The Cuckoo s Nest

Book: One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest It Says... I say... And So... â€Å"A success, they say, but I say he’s just another robot for the Combine and might be better off as a failure†¦Ã¢â‚¬ (17). The mental institutions way of helping people is by â€Å"fixing† them, which means drugging them so they are like robots. The word â€Å"robots† has significance because a robot is not able to think for themselves, and is just controlled by whomever.It robs the patients a chance at actually improving their mental health, so they can be a part of society again. In addition, the phrase â€Å"a success† means that the unawareness and inability for one to think for themselves is key for the staff to be able to handle the patients. Patients are trapped in their own mind. Lastly, the use of Kesey’s informal language gives us a vivid perspective from the shoes of the patients. The theme of unawareness occurs because it is encouraged by the staff in the hospital. Eventually, the patients may get tired of being a robot, and rebel against the staff. In addition, we see a pattern of the patients having no say into what goes into their body, or are misinformed about the potential dangers of the medicine. Not having a say can make one lose purpose in their life, and see no reason to improve themselves daily. Very much like today, medical experts are quick to prescribe medicine that has terrible side effects. â€Å"...The staff usually don’t even notice me; I move around in my chores and they see right through me like IShow MoreRelatedOne Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest Speech Act Theory Essay1281 Words   |  6 PagesKen Kesey forms the intricate relationships among the characters in the novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest by the unique use of perspective and speech. Throughout the novel, Kesey depicts this connection between the public world and the seemingly closed off society inside the mental institution. This creates two separate spheres separated by a few walls and doors. Kesey goes on to form a unique perspective in the novel, told by a paranoid schizophrenic, with the narrator’s caricature-like

The Philosophical Object Of Buddhism - 1060 Words

Over the course of our lectures, we have seen how it is possible to recognise family resemblances among different Buddhisms. Using the three keys taught in the lectures, and with reference to the readings, describe how this poem might be recognised as part of the scholarly object â€Å"Buddhism,† and how it might not be recognised as such. The protagonist of the poem, Who Are You, attempts to define his identity in the manner that most humans fall victim to. The inquirer, assumed to be Buddhist, is unsatisfied with his response as it contradicts the Dharma of the enlightened Buddha. Peter, when asked, â€Å"Who are you?† endeavors to label himself by the people that surround him, the place in which he was born, and the traits that he feels†¦show more content†¦The buddhist questioner, unsatisfied with Peter’s definition of the self interrogates him further and leads Peter to the second aggregate, vedana, feelings and sensations. Peter explains that his youngest daughter was a world class gymnast and his mother died when he was a child. These experiences give him feelings of joy and pain, and identify with Peter’s sense of self. Still unsatisfied, the buddhist questioner directs Peter to the third aggregate, samjna, cognition and perception. Peter says â€Å"I am an intelligent, accomplish ed man.† According to Peter, he perceives himself through his intelligence and success. Still unsatisfied, the buddhist asks him where Peter’s feelings are located, luring Peter to the fourth aggregate, Samskara, mental formation. Peter replies that his feelings are closer to his heart. At this point, he uses the word closer because he does not truly know where his feelings are located. Through this use of cautious language, one can see that Peter is mentally engaging with the conversation. Finally, the last of the five is when Peter is stumped at the perplexing questions of the buddhist and Peter simply says â€Å"I don’t know† who I am. It is at this point where Peter recognizes that all aspects of self are combined and intertwined and one cannot identify themselves using only one of these five essential components. The Four Noble Truths are seen in this poem, highlighting the teachings of the Buddha. The first of these four, Duhkha, is a

Can Make a Big Difference free essay sample

These sorts of people include Connectors, or natural socialites with many onnections; Mavens, information specialists who share their new-found information with others; and Salesmen, who persuade people into agreeing with them on several levels. The Law of the Few states that when these sorts of people are informed of and sold on a product or idea, they will take it unpon themselves to make the product a widespread success. Gladwell illustrates this through Hushpuppies, a once dying brand, that became a massive phenomenon due to its acceptance from a few SoHo fashionistas. The second law Gladwell outlines is the Stickiness Factor. The Stickiness Factor is he element in any media or product that makes it memorable and significant. Gladwell proves this factor is effective through describing how Sesame Street was formulated. The producers of this childrens learning program used several tests, such as measuring and tracking childrens irises and recording their recall levels, to determine if Sesame Streets content stuck with the viewing children. We will write a custom essay sample on Can Make a Big Difference or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Because of disappointing outcomes, Big Bird and Oscar the Grouch were created to increase the shows Stickiness Factor and secured the shows huge success (Gladwell 103-10). pidemics are sensitive to the conditions and circumstances of the times and places in which they occur (Gladwell 139). Simply stated, people are their environment and will act congruently to their surroundings. Gladwell illustrated this by pointing out that when there was a zero tolerance policy on fare hopping and graffiti on New York City subways in the 1980s, overall crime rates in the city decreased dramatically as well (Gladwell 142). New and Interesting Ideas from The Tipping Point Aside from the main three laws Gladwell has presented in this book, he examines a few side concepts as well. One discussed concept is The Rule of 150. This rule claims that, based on the size of the human cranium, people can only sustain relationships with about 147. 8 or 150 other people (Gladwell 179). He defends this argument through Gore, a company that has no hierarchy of management and determines salaries based on collective agreements. This successful yet abnormal company has found that after the hire of 150 employees per plant the lack of management becomes an issue (Gladwell 183 184). In addition to The Rule of 1 50 Gladwell also investigates how rumors are created and why they are infectious. Gladwell analizes rumors by saying that they are first leveled, meaning the details that are vital for understanding the true story are left out. Next the rumor is sharpened, meaning the left over details that support the strangeness of the rumor are given extra emphasis. Finally the rumor is assimilated, meaning the entire story is changed so that those spreading it can make sense of it. Gladwell relates this to The Law of the Few by saying the Mavens, Connectors, and Salesmen need to use this process for a phenomenon to occur (Gladwell 201-203). How The Tipping Point Relates to My Other Business Classes Gladwells book The Tipping Point presents several abstract concepts that can be easily applied to several of my Marketing courses. This book uses an abundance of evidence to support claims that are sometimes derived from recall tests, analyses on iris tracking, and secondary statistical information. All of these concepts are also discussed in my Marketing Research course. This book also deeply describes the Law of the Few as well as The Stickiness Factor, which could both easily be applied to my Advertising and Promotions course in terms of constructing a successful campaign. The Stickiness Factor is also relatable to Consumer Behavior in the sense that a product needs to produce a stimulus or sensation. Is The Tipping Point is Helpful for Managers Although primarily targeted towards marketers and sociologists, The Tipping Point could be applied to management as well. It is vital for any manager to understand how people think and act. This applies not only in the marketplace but in the office as well. By using the Power of Context law, a manager may manipulate any work environment to increase productivity or even boost morale. A manager could also act s a Maven, Connector, or Salesman in selling any new company policies, work techniques, or products to his superiors, subordinates, and clients as well. How The Tipping Point is Helpful for Business Students The Tipping Point is indeed beneficial for business students to read. The book examines what makes a product successful and why phenomenons and trends occur. human psyche is vital for any success in your business. This book outlines why consumers are attracted to a product and gives insight on how to manipulate and use a marketplace to your advantage.

Liberalism And Conservatism Essays - Political Ideologies

Liberalism And Conservatism Barry Whiteside Professor Whiteclay English 101 ? 6:30 3 October 2000 Liberalism and Conservatism Liberalism and conservatism have been political ideas and thoughts from the very birth of our democracy. Their views and points of the government's role in a democratic society have changed over the years, but the basic ideas and principles have remained the same. There are many different degrees of liberalism and conservatism as almost anyone can be labeled. Some individuals are radical and extreme while others stand on more of a neutral territory, but the debates between the understood ideas of each group have continued throughout the history of the United States. We will take liberalism's Gary Doore and conservatism's Irving Kristol as modern day examples and compare and contrast the political ways of thinking of each individual. Conservatism is comprised of religion, nationalism, and economic growth. Among these, Irving Kristol believes religion is most important (18). Why? Obviously, religion doesn't teach people to do wrong. In fact, as most of us know, religion sternly instills good values and morals in a person at an early age. These ideas are what tell people right from wrong, good from bad. Religion motivates people to succeed in life not in materialistic aspects, but in law abiding, respectful aspects. Respect for God, life and other human beings. So how can this be bad for a society? It can't and that's why conservatives think it is most important in the function of a government (18-19) If America could live up to the religious standard, crime would be nonexistent. Of course, this is impossible, but it is the idea that drives conservative thinkers. Kristol points out that recent liberal attempts to slow down and decrease the crime rate have not worked (20). Additionally with each liberal program's failure, more and more American people discredit and distrust the government. Overall, the common conservative consensus is that religious ideals should replace big business-like government and the spending that comes with it. (20-21) Liberty, rights, justice and equality are ideals liberalists such as Gary Doore view as the most important aspects in the democracy of America (24). They also feel America has recently drawn away from these ideals and is therefore not as democratic as it once was or can be in the future. Doore believes there is especially room for democratization in the workplace (28). In fact, he points out that it is the lack of freedom of expression and the restrictive environment of the workplace that has led to this situation. More ideas and innovations would come from corporations if they would allow more freedom to its employees. Not only would workers benefit, but the company they work for would also. (28) Another cause for the break down of democracy in America stems from the administrations of Ronald Reagan and George Bush (Doore 26). Because of the Cold War era and the insecurities it brought to the American people, the administrations thought it was necessary to tighten down and take control. To do this they called for more powers to the executive branch. As a result, Doore and other liberals began to see more of an authoritarian government take shape, and the term ?imperial presidency? was created. The situations went as far as banning newspapers and magazines from Cuba, North Vietnam, and Albania (27). These limits, as well as the restrictive environment of the workplace are what liberals feel are most responsible for the decay of democracy that has taken place over the past few decades. Both Doore and Kristol bring up interesting arguments, but they go too far. Kristol was quick to point out that liberal programs have not slowed down the crime rate at all, but the recent attempts by Clinton and his liberal programs have done just that, so their numbers claim. And how about the deficit? Also, a large turnaround. Who or what is responsible for that though? Clinton definitely takes credit for more than he deserves. Doore states that the administrations of Reagan and Bush created somewhat of an authoritarian government. It did go too far, but some of the actions they took were necessary to control the insecurities the Cold War brought forth. It also helped in ending that period. When Doore